He had retired from work at the National Oil Co., settling into the family home in Shiraz, where Baha’i books and papers aided his participation in the Local Spiritual Assembly.

Mr. Enayatollah Eshraqi (also spelled "Inayatu'llah Ishraqi"), a retired employee of the Iranian National Oil Company and member of the marriage counseling committee and Local Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is in Shiraz, is one of the 206 Iranian Baha’is listed in a 1999 report published by the Baha’i International Community. The report, Iran’s Secret Blueprint for the Destruction of a Religious Community, documents the persecutions of the members of the Faith in the Islamic Republic of Iran and lists the Baha’is killed since 1978. Additional information was drawn from the newspaper Khabar-e Jonub, published in Shiraz (22 February 1983), and from various issues of the The Baha’i World. See for example: Vol. XVIII, 1979-1983, Haifa 1986 or description of events as published in A Tribute to the Faithful by Mah Mihr Gulistanih, or Olya's Story by Olya Roohizadegan and A Congressional Hearing in World Order Magazine, Winter 1983-1984 edition and a letter written by Mr. Eshraqi to his family outside of Iran on 29/11/1981.

Mr. Eshraqi was first arrested along with his wife and two daughters in 1981 (Olya's Story p. 173 & World Order p. 36). On Tuesday, 24 November 1981, their home was searched by revolutionary guards and their Baha'i books and papers were all confiscated. The next day, around 12 noon, all four members of the Eshraqi family and their two houseguests were arrested and taken to the Sepah [Revolutionary Guards headquarters]. Around Friday noon their interrogations took place and by late afternoon, they were released.

The Baha’is in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Background

The authorities of the Islamic Republic have subjected the members of the Baha'i religious community of Iran - the largest religious minority, with approximately 300 thousand members in 1979(1)- to systematic harassment and persecution, depriving them of their most fundamental human rights. The Baha'i religion is not recognized under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic, and Iranian authorities refer to it as a heresy. As a result, the Baha'is have been denied the rights associated with the status of a religious minority; they cannot profess and practice their faith, and are banned from public functions. Discrimination under the law and in practice has subjected them to abuse and violence.(2)

Persecution of Baha’is in Iran is not specific to the time of the Islamic Republic but it was in this era that it was amplified and institutionalized. During the Revolution itself, supporters of Ayatollah Khomeini attacked Baha’i homes and businesses and in certain instances, even committed murder.

On the eve of his return from France to Iran, in response to a question regarding political and religious freedom of Baha’is under the rule of an Islamic government, Ayatollah Khomeini stated: “They are a political party; they are harmful and detrimental. They will not be acceptable.” The interviewer asked another question: “Will they be free to perform their religious rites?” The Ayatollah responded: “No.” Khomeini had previously “spoken of the Baha’i threat to the Shah’s regime, Islam, national unity, and national security” in various speeches. (Asoo website, October 6, 2015).

Arrest and detention

Mr. Eshraqi was arrested for the second time along with his wife and daughter around 8:30 pm on 29 November 1982 at his home in Shiraz. He was taken to the Sepah Detention Centre, was processed and a bail of 10 Million Rials was set for him, which he refused to provide unless his wife and daughter could also be freed. Because of his religious beliefs, the prison authorities considered him to be an unbeliever, and thus "unclean", and he was subjected to humiliating treatment similar to that of atheist political prisoners. Prison wardens refused to have any physical contact with the prisoner even when, for example, they were guiding the blindfolded prisoner to the interrogation room. In such case guards would give him the end of a folded newspaper and hold the other end, avoiding contact. On 12 January 1983 he was transferred to Adelabad prison. He remained in custody at Adelabad Prison until his execution. Mr. Eshraqi was allowed to see his wife and daughter, who remained in custody, once before his execution. (World Order p. 37)

Trial

There is no detail available about Mr. Eshraqi's trial. However, family visitors and former cellmates report that he had had been repeatedly interrogated by or under the supervision of the religious magistrate. According to reports by the the Baha’i World, authorities informed the defendant that he would be subjected to four “sessions” in which he would be given the opportunity to recant his faith and accept Islam. He was informed that if he did not sign a prepared statement rejecting Baha’ism, he would be killed. It is unclear if all these sessions took place and whether or not these sessions replaced a trial.

Charges

The text of the indictment was not provided to Mr. Eshraqi’s family. However, the available information indicates that the charges against the defendant related to his religious beliefs. While in detention, the defendant was interrogated and pressured to recant his faith. Further, in an interview published in the Newspaper Khabar-e Jonub the religious judge, Head of the Islamic Revolutionary Tribunal of Shiraz, in charge of the case, warned the Baha’is “to embrace dear Islam and …recant Baha’ism, which is rationally and logically doomed, before it is too late”.

The judge also discussed at length the charges and the alleged crimes committed by the defendants and argued that they were arrested because they were active members of the Baha’i administration and because of their “direct or indirect” relationship with the House of Justice based in Israel, which follows the Israeli government.

The judge’s statements regarding those arrested also stressed that the religious activities of the defendants were criminal activities based on Article 13 of the constitution, which “deems illegal any activity for Baha’is and considers a crime the organization of committees, councils, or receptions and any such activities…”

Finally, in his interview, the Head of the Shiraz Revolutionary Tribunal addressed the Baha’i community as a whole, asking its members to recant their faith or face the consequences: “Soon a day will come when the Muslim nation will deal with the Baha’is the way they dealt with the Hypocrites** …who have diabolic religious pretexts, and will carry out its religious duty, and Baha’is should know that …the Hezbollah Umma will have no difficulty uprooting them.”

Evidence of guilt

No information is available on the evidence presented against the defendant or the latter’s relationship with the Israeli government. However, in his February interview the religious judge elaborated on the Baha’i community’s activities and beliefs as the evidence of their guilt.

The Judge refuted the assertion that Baha’is do not get involved in politics and abide by their government noting that they had not been supportive of the Islamic Republic and had their own administration: “…These people say: ‘We did not participate in any demonstration against the idolatrous [regime]… We did not participate in any of the Islamic Republic’s votes…because all this is politics and, from a religious perspective, we condemn participation in politics. We have our own elections and the Baha’i administration is independent...” While establishing the fact that Baha’is act independently from the state and have an independent administration, the House of Justice, as evidence that they are not loyal to the government, the judge also argued that because the House of Justice is located in Israel, the Baha’is are loyal to the government of Israel.

The very fact that Baha’is have a religious administration outside the “administration of Islam”, is, for the judge, a proof of disloyalty and guilt: “So we can see that these…children of Satan and mercenaries of Israel’s House of Justice have created an administration and a government, no matter how ridiculous, in the face of the government and the administration of Islam. Ironically, they say that ‘we are submissive to the government and whatever the government says we abide by it.’ However, this is only a way of covering the fact that they are acting independently from the people.”

Defense

No information is available on Mr. Eshraqi's defense. However, the representatives of the Baha'i community stress that their members are being persecuted for their religious beliefs. They note that Baha'is' requests to access their files are usually denied, and that even though they have been allowed to avail themselves of the services of a defense counsel since the mid-1990s, attorneys are often under pressure not to accept Baha'i clients. They refute the validity of charges such as counter-revolutionary political activities or spying leveled against them in Iranian courts. They point out that the fundamental principles of their religion require them to show loyalty and obedience to their government and refrain from any political involvement. They believe that the accusation of espionage for Israel is unfounded and based solely on the fact that the Baha'i World Centre is in Israel. They point out that this centre was established on Mount Carmel in the late 19th century, long before the establishment of the State of Israel.

Judgment

The authorities did not communicate the text of the sentence to Mr. Eshraqi’s family. However, the Head of the Islamic Revolutionary Tribunal justified the sentence against the 22 arrested Baha'is in his February interview with Khabar-e Jonub newspaper where he stated:

“It is clear that there is no room, whatsoever, for Baha’is and Baha’ism in the Islamic Republic of Iran.. ...” He referred to the individuals who were sentenced to death as kofar harbi [refers to those unbelievers who live in areas outside Muslim rule and who have no rights, not even the right to live] and noted that: “the individuals who have been sentenced to death were active members of the Baha’i faith to whose evil, naïve people were exposed. Their association with satans inside and outside [the country] and their enmity with Islam and Muslims are to a large measure obvious.”

The publication of this interview led the families of the prisoners to visit the Emam Jom’eh (Friday Prayer leader) and Governor of the Fars Province as well as officials in the Capital to look into the authenticity of the news. At the same time an international campaign in favor of the imprisoned Baha'is was launched, but it remained unsuccessful. Instead, the authorities denied issuing the death sentences and showed signs of great frustration at the publication of such news. He along with the rest of the Baha'i prisoners were gathered by the prosecutor one last time to give them a chance to recant their Faith. When the defendant refused to do so, the Revolutionary Court of Shiraz sentenced Mr. Eshraqi to death. The Supreme Revolutionary Court approved the sentence and he was hanged at Chogan Square in Shiraz on 16 June 1983.

The authorities did not inform Mr. Eshraqi’s family of his execution. His family learned of the execution accidentally and was not allowed to bury his body. The authorities buried him along with the other executed Baha’is in the Baha’i cemetery of Shiraz, without washing him or observing any other burial custom.

----------------------------------------  

1- ‘Slow Death for Iran’s Baha’is’ by Richard N. Ostling, Time Magazine,20 February 1984. Also see ‘The Persecution of the Baha’is of Iran, 1844-1984, by Douglas Martin, Baha’i Studies,volume 12/13, 1984, p. 3. There is no information about the current number of Baha’is in Iran.

2- The Islamic Republic Penal Code grants no rights to Baha'is, and the courts have denied them the right to redress or to protection against assault, murder, and other forms of persecution and abuse. In so doing, the courts have treated Baha'is as unprotected citizens or "apostates," citing eminent religious authorities whose edicts are considered to be a source of law equal to acts of Parliament. The Founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Khomeini, made execution a punishment for the crime of apostasy and decreed that a Muslim would not be punished for killing an apostate.