Abdorrahman Boroumand Center

for Human Rights in Iran

https://www.iranrights.org
Promoting tolerance and justice through knowledge and understanding
Flogging

Flogging, Maryam, Marzieh, Hamedan, Jomhuri Eslami, September 5, 2002

Jomhuri Eslami
September 5, 2002
Newspaper article

Jomhuri Eslami Newspaper

Archive/CD

September 5, 2002

Various

Discovery of Drugs and Arrest of Thieves

HAMEDAN-Jomhuri Eslami Correspondent: 150 packets of opium were discovered in the stomach of a traveler in Hamedan.

According to the report of the chief of the Information Center of Hamedan Province Police Command, counter-narcotics officers succeeded in identifying one traveler as Vali B., 24-years-old, from Malayer, who was suspected of swallowing opium; after pumping his stomach several times, 150 sealed packets of opium weighing 975 grams were discovered. The aforementioned person procured the opium from the eastern cities of the country and after swallowing it, transported it to Malayer for distribution; but with the cleverness of the officers, he was arrested at the Nahavand to Malayer checkpoint.

Also, a person named Mojtaba Y, native and resident of Tehran, reported to Hamedan police station that two women stole a necklace and a gold plate from his daughter and fled; with the plaintiff’s guidance and the timely action of the officer located at the thieves’ station, Maryam Q, 15-years-old and her mother Marzieh, 32, were identified and brought to the police station.

During the inspection, the aforementioned persons confessed to stealing the gold and explained that they swallowed it for fear of the police officers, hence, they were sent to the hospital and their stomachs were pumped, but the gold was not recovered, and the relevant doctor stated that it would take three days to remove the gold and it could be done only through surgery or evacuation. Thus, the case was sent to the judiciary and the defendants were released after paying 50 thousand tomans in damages and a 50 thousand toman fine and enduring 40 lashes from the judicial authorities.

ABF Note

 

Findings of guilt in the Islamic Republic of Iran's Judicial Proceedings

The Islamic Republic of Iran's criminal justice system regularly falls short of the standards for due process necessary for impartiality, fairness, and efficacy. Suspects are often held incommunicado and not told of the reason for their detainment. Defendants are frequently prohibited from examining the evidence used against them. Defendants are sometimes prohibited from having their lawyers present in court. Additionally, confessions, made under duress or torture, are commonly admitted as proof of guilt. Because Iran's courts regularly disregard principles essential to the proper administration of justice, findings of guilt may not be evaluated with certainty.

Corporal Punishment: the Legal context in the Islamic Republic of Iran

The Islamic Republic's criminal code recognizes corporal punishment for a wide range of offenses: consumption of alcohol, theft, adultery, "flouting" of public morals, and mixing of the sexes in public. Judges have the latitude to mete out corporal punishment for those sentenced to death. In such cases, the flogging is carried out before death to maximize the suffering of defendant. Aside from flogging, the Islamic Republic also employs amputations as a punishment for theft. In such cases, the defendant is taken to a hospital and put under anesthesia as his hand or foot is amputated. In some cases the left foot and right hand are cut off, making it difficult for the condemned to walk, even with the assistance of a cane or crutches.

The Islamic Republic's Systematic Violation of its International Obligations under International Law

The use of corporal punishment is contrary to international law and is addressed in several international agreements. Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which Iran has ratified, states that, "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment." Identical language is also used in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which Iran is also a party to. The strongest expression of international disapproval is contained in the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT). This treaty defines torture as, "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as ... punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed." Although the Islamic Republic of Iran has yet to sign the CAT, the prohibition on torture is now considered jus cogens and, therefore, part of customary international law. Furthermore, even though the norm against corporal punishment is not yet a jus cogens, there is increasing evidence that it is illegal under international human rights law.[1] In Osbourne v. Jamaica, the Committee Against Torture (a body of experts responsible for monitoring compliance with the Convention) held that "corporal punishment constitutes cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment contrary to Article 7 of the Convention." The Islamic Republic of Iran's systematic violations of its obligations under international law have been addressed by the UN General Assembly multiple times, most recently in December 2007. In Resolution 62/168, the UN expressed deep concern with Iran's continued flouting of international human rights law, particularly, "confirmed instances of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including flogging and amputations."